20 May 2024
We often under-estimate the significant impact that residents can have on local businesses without spending money.  Yes, spending money ultimately is what keeps any business in business, but not every
13 May 2024
It has often been said that music can heal the soul. That being the case, one must wonder, might music also be able to heal the soul of a community,
06 May 2024
In the arena of community revitalization and development, smaller communities will often face significant challenges in attracting investment dollars and revitalizing their local economies. Traditional methods of revitalization, such as








Evolution or Revolution When Transforming a Community?

11 September 2023

Every community comes to a crossroads, should they transform via evolution versus revolution?  Make no mistake, transforming a local community is a complex undertaking that can be approached through either evolution or revolution, and both methods have their pros and cons.  Your choice between them depends on the specific circumstances and goals of the community. Let’s explore the advantages and disadvantages of both the evolutionary versus the revolutionary approaches in the context of community development and transformation.


Some of the advantages of the process of evolution might be greater stability and continuity. Most often, evolution tends to be gradual and incremental. This provides the stability and continuity that help to not jolt a community. This will mean lower resistance as people are generally more receptive to gradual change versus a more radical approach. These smaller changes usually equate to less resistance.  Evolutionary changes often involve community members in decision-making processes, fostering a sense of ownership and inclusivity. This can lead to more democratic and participatory governance.  Evolutionary approaches are more likely to preserve and respect the cultural identity and traditions of the community, as they allow for adjustments that take local values and customs into account.


Some of the disadvantages of the evolutionary process is that it can be slow, which may not be suitable for communities facing urgent problems or crises that require immediate solutions.  Some community members may still resist even gradual changes, particularly if they perceive them as a threat to their interests or values.  Evolutionary approaches may be less inclined to embrace radical innovations that could potentially bring significant benefits to the community.  Incremental changes may not address deep-seated issues or inequalities within the community, leading to persistent challenges.


For communities needing deep-rooted change, the revolutionary process can bring about dramatic and rapid change, which is advantageous when a community faces severe problems or needs to respond quickly to crises.  Radical or revolutionary change can break through the inertia of the status quo and challenge deeply ingrained systems of power and inequality.  Revolutionary change often encourages new ideas and innovative solutions, pushing the community to think beyond traditional boundaries.  A successful revolutionary change process can inspire community members and create momentum for further positive changes.  Revolution has the potential to address systemic issues and inequalities more effectively than evolutionary methods.


While I am firmly in the camp of revolution for transformation over evolution, there are some things to consider when going the revolutionary route.  Revolution can lead to chaos and instability for many. Humans are usually adverse to change, the revolutionary approach will jar many out of their comfort zones. You will find that some community members may strongly oppose revolutionary change, leading to division and conflicts within the community. While this can occur, it is one of those necessary evil’s communities must tackle head on.  Revolutions are inherently unpredictable, and their outcomes can be uncertain, leading to unintended consequences.  If a community fails to address the long-term ramifications of the revolutionary approach, they might miss out on some of the long-term solutions.   


Whether to transform a local community through evolution or revolution depends on various factors, including the community's current state, the nature of its challenges, and the preferences and values of its members. Both approaches have their merits and drawbacks. Evolution is often more suitable for stable communities seeking gradual improvement and sustainability, while revolution may be necessary in situations of crisis or when deep-rooted issues need to be urgently addressed.


In practice, a combination of both approaches, tailored to the specific context, may offer the best path toward positive community transformation. Ultimately, the success of any transformation effort hinges on the active participation and engagement of community members, regardless of the chosen approach.


John Newby is a nationally recognized Columnist, Speaker, & Publisher. He consults with Chambers, Communities, Business & Media. His “Building Main Street, not Wall Street,” column appears in 60+ newspapers and media outlets. As founder of Truly-Local, he assists chambers, communities, media, and businesses in creating synergies that build vibrant communities. He can be reached at: John@Truly-Local.org.